Next week sees the Coleridge Conference (23-27 July) – a biennial,
international gathering of over 70 scholars and readers of the works of Samuel
Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834) (pictured above in 1799). Coleridge’s writings are
at the heart of my own research scholarship. This year I have helped to
organise the Conference, together with Paul Cheshire, Dr Felicity James, Peter
Larkin, and the Conference Director, Professor Tim Fulford. I’m also a Trustee
of the Friends of Coleridge – the society that aims to foster interest in the
life and works of Coleridge and his circle. I’m sometimes asked: why Coleridge?
This seems like a good time to say a little on the subject.
As these things often do, it all started in my teens. Although
aware of The Rime of the Ancient
Mariner before, I only really found my way into Coleridge when studying him
for A-Level, when I was seventeen. Then something explosive happened – something
revolutionary, in personal terms. Reading in particular his mystery poems – Kubla Khan, Christabel and the Ancient
Mariner – and the blank-verse meditations often referred to as the conversation
poems, something within myself was suddenly articulated and brought into
brilliant focus. For a while, it was a little overwhelming. Kubla Khan, especially, blazed across my
consciousness (as it still does). I read two of the classic critical works on
Coleridge, Coleridge the Visionary
(1959), by John Beer, and The Road to
Xanadu (1930) by John Livingston Lowes – both of which led me into the maze
of Coleridge’s reading and imagining. But it is the title of another of Beer’s
books – Coleridge’s Poetic Intelligence
(1977) – which sums up what fascinated me: a poetic intelligence, calling potential realities into being. By the time a close friend gave me Early Visions, the first volume of Richard
Holmes’ superb biography of Coleridge, for my eighteenth birthday, I was
already inwardly committed to the path I’m on today.
The chemical reaction begun with that first encounter with
Coleridge’s language, and the trace of his being, remains at the glowing core
of my interest in him. But of course, time spent with Coleridge brings other
pleasures. To study Coleridge’s works is to inhabit an endlessly ramifying intellectual
ecosystem – and for me, at least, to become a fellow-adventurer in the biggest
questions we can ask: poetical, political, and metaphysical. You don’t always
have to agree with him, either, to feel your own powers kindle in the presence
of his words.
The poetic intelligence is open-ended - always finding as it makes, and making as it finds - and Coleridge is one of its greatest
exemplars. ‘The End is in the Means’, Coleridge wrote to his son Hartley, in
1820: ‘Southey once said to me: You are nosing every nettle along the Hedge,
while the Greyhound (meaning himself, I presume) wants only to get sight of the
Hare, & FLASH! – strait as a line! – he has it in his mouth! […] But the
fact is – I do not care twopence for the Hare;
but I value most highly the excellencies of scent, patience, discrimination,
free Activity; and find a Hare in every Nettle, I make myself acquainted with.’